Consultant Disappointed in Jim

Posted by Jim Henderson on: 02.21.2006 /

Jim, I’m disappointed you interpreted my comments as a series of warnings. I didn’t intend them that way at all. I read Hemant’s write-up yesterday and thought “maybe I can share some things from my own experience/knowledge that might help him understand the ‘whys’ behind some of what he saw and heard”. I was trying to explain, not to warn. I like people to have information that might be interesting or relevant and my intent was to try to provide some. And I know I’m not an expert; in fact maybe many other people can explain similar things better and more accurately than I can.

Perhaps I wrote too much; perhaps I presumed too much in thinking that Hemant might be interested in what I wrote. Perhaps my ‘tone’ came across otherwise than I intended. If I used your comments space inappropriately I’m sorry. Anyway, please believe that if I wanted to warn him I would have written explicit warnings. In fact, I have nothing to warn him about. I hope Hemant is enjoying visiting various churches as much as I am enjoying reading his write-ups about them.

3 Responses to "Consultant Disappointed in Jim"

  • Comment by: The Consultant

    1 02/21/06 9:58 AM | Comment Link |

    I’m not disappointed in _you_, Jim, only in how you construed my comments of yesterday.

  • Comment by: Jim Henderson

    2 02/21/06 10:11 AM | Comment Link |

    Thanks for playing - I appreciate your heart and insights

  • Comment by: The Consultant

    3 02/21/06 12:41 PM | Comment Link |

    Thanks.