Posted by Ir (Helen) on: 09.24.2006 /
In the bookstore today I discovered The Reason-Driven Life by Robert Price, a new book which evidently is a response to the best-selling Christian book, The Purpose-Driven Life by Rick Warren.
It looked interesting, so I bought it. Here’s an excerpt from the inside front cover:
Rick Warren’s bestselling The Purpose-Driven Life has become the great inspirational book of our decade, and to Robert M. Price that’s a complete mystery. Price, now a humanist and New Testament scholar, spent a dozen years as a member of the American evangelical subculture, and in his witty and poignant rejoinder to Pastor Warren, The Reason-Driven Life, Price exposes Warrenism as stale, warmed-over fundamentalism. Among other revelations, Price demonstrates how this popular “personal relationship with Christ” theology actually has no biblical basis whastoever.
However, the real tragedy of Warren’s appraoch to Christianity, according to Price, is that it tries to meet a genuine spiritual hunger with puerile sentiment and infantile beliefs. It teaches that strict adherence to fundamentalist teaching of God’s will is the only way to find a purpose in life. Price recognizes that fundamental Christianity as espoused by Warren stunts an individual’s growth personally, morally and intellectually, and that the only worthwhile critique of Warren’s The Purpose-Driven Life is to provide a better, more reasonable alternative for people who are seeking maturity and meaning in life.
Comment by: Hemant
1Robert Price is on the Secular Student Alliance advisory board as well. A great guy!
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/125
Comment by: Ir
2Thanks for your comment, Hemant. Robert Price seems fun and he’s clearly very articulate and insightful, based on what I’ve read in the book so far. I can’t say he’s any ‘friendlier’ than Dawkins but I’m interested enough in what he has to say that that wouldn’t stop me reading this book.
I expect the same is true of ‘The God Delusion’ (which we also purchased today) - in other words, I’ll probably read it even if I would have preferred Dawkins didn’t refer to belief in God as a ‘delusion’.
Comment by: Siamang
3I once picked up a friend’s copy of PDL to read the introduction.
The introduction said something along these lines:
“All of us have a purpose in life. God is calling you to your purpose. With God, there are no co-incidences. There is a reason why you are holding this book right now. God has decreed from the beginning of time this moment when you would be holding this book. ”
That’s just the introduction as I remember it. It’s probably more subtle than that. But I couldn’t help but think “How hubristic this Warren guy is.” I could say the same thing, ‘God decreed from the beginning of time that you’d be reading this email from Siamang right now! This is not a coincidence! God has fated you to listen to me and believe everything I’m saying!’
So I then picked up a Playboy magazine, and I was immediately warmed by the idea that God wanted me to read that as well.
j/k
I saw Reason Driven Life at the bookstore last week. It seemed like a Christian book, basically a taking apart of Warren from a christian perspective. I may have misunderstood it, but either way I realized I wasn’t the intended reader because that aforementioned introduction was the sum-total of my exposure to a Purpose Driven Life.
Comment by: Julie Marie
4my former church was purpose driven. the philosophy was a huge factor in my re-examining my what I was basing my beliefs on, because the constant exhortations to evangelize, to do good for the express purpose of evangelizing set off the gongs in my head. I couldn’t put my finger on what was so objectionable at the time - but it so upset me that to my horror, I burst into tears at one “40 days of Purpose” meeting when I was pushed on why I felt this type of evangelism emphatically not for me. I couldn’t articulate why, I was way too steeped in fundamentalism, but I knew I just couldn’t, just wouldn’t, go forth with this agenda.
Three months later I discovered Off The Map. I can’t begin to say how thankful I am for that discovery, not just for me, but for my child too. I had the best intentions in the world as a mother (still do) but I would have sent him straight down the fundy road. I’m still sliding all over the bench - and sometimes I fall off of it, but at least the cords that kept me from thinking things through have been broken for good.
Comment by: Ir
5Siamang wrote:
Wow…I feel so honored, Siamang! What pearls of wisdom do you have for me? :-)
I’ve only flicked through it so far; my sense is that much of it is a strong rebuttal to fundamentalist/conservative evangelical forms of Christianity and atheists would be agree wtih his criticisms of it and appreciate how articulate (and sarcastic) he is about it.
It is written as a response to PDL but I think it would make sense as a stand-alone book because he tells the reader what aspect of Rick Warren’s theology he’s disagreeing with as he goes along.
It seems to me that as critiques of fundamentalist/conversative evangelical theology go, this is one of the better ones I’ve seen, because the author really knows what he’s talking about, having been a Baptist pastor once.
It is rather sarcastic and I expect it would make Christians wince unless they are very thick-skinned or very liberal.
(I’m realizing I’m being inconsistent if I complain about Dawkin’s tone and say Robert Price’s tone is ok - so I don’t want to do that.)
Anyway Siamang, did you notice when you saw it in the bookstore, who wrote the foreword? Julia Sweeney!
Comment by: Ir
6Julie Marie, wow, how interesting that the PDL was part of what pushed you to the ‘breaking point’, or rather the ‘breaking away point’.
Comment by: NCxian
7I found PDL just too boring! (I know that is a superficial review, but it makes up for it in its conciseness!)
Comment by: Julie Marie
8yeah…didn’t see that one coming ;)
okay I’ll fess up. I bought the book and the companion workbook, but left them on the shelf with intentions to “serious up” about it. Then came the “Purpose Driven Community” and “40 Days of Purpose” and somehow, when we had to clear the bookshelves to move them when we got new carpeting, those books wound up in the trash. Yes the trash. Not even the “give to goodwill” box.
Comment by: Julie Marie
9Siamang,
One of the things that I get irrationally angry over is the “it was all meant to be” line of ‘reasoning’. Thank you for giving me a way to laugh and lighten up about it a little bit :)
Comment by: Siamang
10Yeah, I noticed Julia wrote that.
You know, I totally misunderstood the book when I looked at it.
My first impression was that it would be its own book. Like a self help guide to building a reason-driven life for yourself.
But upon looking at it, I noticed it was really a criticism of Warren’s book, and not a guide for atheist living. I admit to only giving it a couple of minutes and a few page-flips.
I think there may be a need, however, for a book along the lines I was expecting. A guide to leading an ethical, fulfilled, honest and giving life away from faith.
Comment by: Ir
11Siamang, I see what you mean. I think there is some positive guidance about how to live the Reason-Driven Life but overall the book seems to be very much a reaction against the PDL.
I’ve read a number of ‘guides to living’. Sometimes I think I get as much out of novels as I do out of the ‘guides to living’. I find myself thinking about the characters in the novels I read - whether they made good choices and what they could have done differently, if not. And good novels are fun to read. Guides to living quickly get boring.
Comment by: Siamang
12Yes, but I still think there’s a need for a book here. Not that I like guides to living… I don’t. But I would like the bold idea of such a guide existing.
Comment by: Mike O
13Hello … your friendly neighborhood Bible banger checking in!
I liked PDL.
One criticism I have gotten from non-Cs is that I don’t look at opposing views enough. For that reason alone, I am actually interested in reading RDL - especially if the author has a good wit about him. I don’t mind being the butt of a joke if the jokes make valid points and are based on truth. I can learn from that.
I don’t know that I would ever buy RDL, but if I had it, I would read it. After all, it’s in my best interest to understand the criticisms of something I accept. Even though I seriously doubt I would agree … I should at least understand.
Trouble is, so many books … so little time. It’s not likely this one will make it to the top any time soon.
Comment by: Karen
14Julie Marie wrote:
Wow, interesting. So do you think there was some powerful psychological reaction you were having, but you couldn’t put your finger on what it is or why?
I can relate to this as I think back over the years and wonder why I wasn’t questioning more and being more curious as an FE Xian! How could I buy teaching that was really so far-out, and sometimes even kooky (like, the world is going to end in 1983)?
Now I’m starting to realize, as I’m getting more distance, that I was often questioning, or uncomfortable, or challenging. I just learned to keep that to myself, and keep pushing it down in my brain.
No wonder I was ripe for the mid-life crisis, huh? ;-)
Comment by: Julie Marie
15Underneath it all, I think it was the teaching that I was responsible for something that was completely outside of my control (someone else’s salvation) and that by NOT doing things the PD way I was leaving someone dangling over the pits of hell that broke me. I couldn’t put it all together then, but looking back, I’ve had that same gasping suffocating feeling before - trying to keep my mother from being out of control. I had no more control over that than I would have over someone elses salvation. So yeah, I think it was a powerful psychological reaction.
Doesn’t that just stink? It does seem to take a crisis to break through that.
Comment by: Julie Marie
16Karen - how long have you been away from FE xianity?
Comment by: Karen
17Julie wrote:
Oh my. That’s awful. Yeah, the tears make a lot of sense in that context. :-(
Hmm… it’s hard to say because it’s been such a drawn-out process. I would say I started seriously entertaining my own questions (consciously thinking about them instead of repressing them) about eight or nine years ago. Then about five years ago, I dealt with the midlife crisis and decided to formally explore other forms of Christianity and eventually other religions.
But all during this time I was still attending an FE church off and on (for family’s sake) so I wasn’t exactly “away” from the influence. I did distance myself from extra-service activities like bible study, choir, ministry and small group mostly because I didn’t want to devote that much time to it and I felt like a hypocrite.
The last time I went to church was the weekend after Hurricane Katrina, so that’s just a little over a year ago. I started calling myself “atheist” probably 2+ years ago.
Comment by: Ir
18Hey Karen, that’s about when I quit church! My last Sunday was the last Sunday in September last year.
I think (early!) midlife was a factor in my change in beliefs also.
Comment by: Julie Marie
19Hey Karen,
Thanks for sharing that part of your story. 8-9 years is a long journey. I would think it would be particularly difficult to work through the questions and deal with the emotions related to that while still attending services. I think you are a strong woman!
Comment by: Karen
20Helen:
Interesting coincidence. I’ll tell you why I remember the date of my last attendance so precisely.
That first week in Sept. was a traumatic time, as I’m sure you remember. I shed a lot of tears while glued to the TV, watching helpless, stranded people agonize over their sick grandparents who couldn’t get their medicine and their hungry babies who had no formula. I was just overwhelmed by feelings of powerlessness and injustice.
We went to the “contemporary” service that weekend, which featured a praise band instead of the choir and tended to have a perpetually upbeat tone. I was really in a bad mood but I thought maybe there would be some contemplative moments that might help lift my spirits.
Unfortunately, that entire service included only a throwaway mention of the week’s events. I think someone threw in a “God help the poor people in the Gulf Coast” during one of the prayers, and that was it.
The rest went along just as always, with big smiles and lots of “Praise the Lords” and people lifting their hands in the air while singing songs like, “God is so goooooodddd …” and I just got madder and madder. When it was over, I turned to my husband and said, “That’s it. I can’t go here anymore,” and I explained how out-of-touch and insensitive all the happy talk felt and how much it offended me. He understood and let me off the hook from attending after that.
Comment by: Karen
21Julie:
Thank you. I am much stronger today than I was back then, but I come from pretty strong stock so I’m sure that helped. :-)
A wise woman in my ex-fundy group told me when I first joined that it takes about 2-3 years of learning to think independently for every year you spent not thinking for yourself in very strict religious systems. So, considering I was an FE Xian for about 30 years, her estimate was about right. I’m quite settled in my thinking now, thought I’m still processing some stuff, like recognizing how often I was at odds with the orthodox teaching but I repressed my own scruples.
I think I mentioned here or on the DB that I sometimes sneaked out of church after helping in Sunday school and walked to a local bookstore for coffee during weeks when I couldn’t bring myself to sit through the sermon. ;-) So I did find ways to cope, and the Internet was a huge, huge help. I don’t know how anyone managed to “leave the fold” before we had this ability to network like we do now.
Comment by: Ir
22Karen, I completely understand why being at a service where the hurricane was barely mentioned would be the last straw. It makes church seem so detached from reality…
Sorry - I keep forgetting that your husband goes to church. That gave you a reason for going that I didn’t have, since I’m married to an atheist. No wonder you kept going. I kept going for other reasons, like, I was afraid of becoming too socially isolated if I quit - I was afraid that might adversely affect my mental health.
Comment by: NCxian
23Karen, this reminded of the quote by Christine Wicker that Jim posted over at Doable Evangelism.
Comment by: Ir
24NCxian - I love that quote! I find Christine’s writing soooo insightful.
Comment by: Julie Marie
25I wish oh how I wish that scruple repression thing didn’t happen! I am so glad for the internet too - I remember how scarey it was to articulate my first non-fundy pondering, and how comforting it was to have you, Ir, and NCxian respond that it didn’t sound heretical at all…
my last service was the Sunday after Ash Wed. I actually really enjoyed the Ash Wed service…until we went to get Cody and he shot out of the children’s classroom upset over the crucifixion. All I could do was hold him and say yes, those people were mean and that story makes Mommy sad too… He was only 3 back then, and a very tender 3 at that…he didn’t have any concept of unfairness or cruelty…I didn’t think it was necessary to go into that part of the story yet, and when I talked to a friend of mine about it, her opinion was that since its central to the faith, it was okay.
Well, it wasn’t okay with me. I lost trust in the judgement of the childrens ministry. Where I was able to work around my personal concerns (the purpose driven thing had happened 3 months earlier) I wouldn’t push down what I felt was an appalling lack of judgement, teaching something as gruesome and inexplicable as the crucifixion, to my wide eyed 3 year old.
Comment by: Karen
26NC:
Yes, nice synergy, NC. Thanks for pointing it out. :-)
Julie:
Awwww … poor little guy. Age 3 seems unnecessarily young for that teaching, particularly if they went into it in detail. I can’t imagine that most 3-year-olds would even begin to grasp it anyway, so what’s the point of introducing an upsetting concept before they’re able to even entertain it in their minds?
I would say my kids weren’t taught anything specific about the crucifixion until they were at least in elementary school - maybe first or second grade.
Comment by: Julie Marie
27thinking back…this was a Wed service. The age groupings are larger in the middle of the week, due to fewer volunteers and fewer children present than weekend services. They probably just went forward with the 2nd and 3rd grade curriculum, rather than adjust for the youngest punkin heads present. I guess the mamma lion can sit down now.
Comment by: Siamang
28That’s terrible, Julie. As the father of a 3 year old, I wince at that story. I know I’m trying to instill social positive behavior in my daughter. I don’t want her to start distrusting people before she has a chance to learn the positive aspects of trusting people. In other words, I’m trying my hardest not to raise a misantrope!
My daughter is attending a Methodist pre-school. But there is no religious education component to it, and the Pastor of the church is a friend of ours, so we don’t expect that to change.
But your story highlights what caused me an initial jitter about taking my daughter to that school. Luckily knowing the pastor helped allay that!
Comment by: Siamang
29argh! misanthrope
Comment by: Julie Marie
30Siamang,
I’m still wincing a little bit. But as far as you raising a misanthrope…somehow, I think the daughter of Mr. “I Love Paris” is going to grow up to love as well. :)
Comment by: benjamin ady
31Karen,
Thankyou for sharing about how the happy happy joy joy talk during the week after the hurricane was one of the things that finally turned you off church. Me too. I had a brilliant experience at a churchish funtion this last weekend (kinda gently begged by my amazing wife to go with her)of being able to step into a conversation that was along the HHJJ lines and introduce some reality into it, after which everyone else started being more real, which was totally awesome from my point of view. Alas this is extremely rare in my experience.
I found the whole PDL thing annoying but from the outside, having never read the book or participated in any event or anything. I have a generalized distaste for things that strike me as being “Christian fads”. Thought everyone might be interested also in checking out Bill’s the porpoise diving life, another alternative to purpose driven life.
On the “What christians ar teaching our children” subject, is anyone else wierded out by christian preschools teaching 3 and 4 year olds to say the pledge of allegiance? I can’t really cope with that. I’m not comfortable with my little kids pledging their allegiance to this republic, and I’m also a bit confused about why christians are doing this at all. but then I don’t get the strange way that american christians seem to mix up being american and being christian into this sort of strange mishmash
Comment by: Karen
32Benjamin,
Interesting to know that someone else had a similar experience in church after the hurricane. I bet more than a handful of people reacted like we did.
That’s really cool that you were able to turn the “HHJJ” talk into something more substantive. In my experience, HHJJ was like a “Happy Face” mask that people in church felt they had to wear in order to validate their devotion, and because they felt like they’d be condemned for “taking their eyes off Jesus” if they came to church with a negative attitude.
In the rare moments when the HHJJ mask came off during bible study or retreats, there was usually a whole lot of hurt and even despair lurking underneath. But those were the times when Christian “fellowship” really took on meaning, for me at least.
The Christian fad that was really big around the time I left (before PDL) was called “Experiencing God.” EVERYONE was doing the workbook and reading the book. I didn’t get a ton out of it, but I was probably already in rebellious mode by that time. ;-)
In my childhood Sunday school, we routinely pledged allegiance first to the American flag, then to the Christian flag and then to the bible. Patriotism and Christianity were completely entwined in the teaching.
Comment by: Ir
33Benjamin, the pledge weirds me out, period, since I didn’t grow up here. I grew up in the UK where we don’t say any sort of pledge. (On the other hand a morning religious gathering was mandatory in schools when I was growing up - no separation of church and state there like there is here…I guess it’s swings and roundabouts…)
Comment by: David H
34I stopped saying the pledge as a junior in my Pennsylvania public high school. A few raised eyebrows was the only response. Just a few years ago some midwestern kids got expelled for the same thing.
I got hung up on “one nation under God.” It was so obviously untrue I stood up one day and just decided I couldn’t say it anymore. The God and country thing has been eating at me ever since. I’m probably a bit of a radical on the subject, in that I think Christians need to give greater value to citizenship in the kingdom of God.
One of the growing problems in the US is that many of the big God and country proponents believe that it is OK to be unGodly in the service of their country. I believe that if you pledge your life to Christ then you can’t ever say it is OK to act unGodly. The ends can’t justify the means, but the means can corrupt the ends.
The American Christian nationalism running through PDL was only one of my problems with the book. We read through it one term in Sunday school and I filled my margins with questions and comments about the faulty logic and ersatz faith in the book.
But what really chaps me about the book is how many have been sold. One of my favorite Christian authors is Philip Yancey. He asks hard questions about his faith and doesn’t pretend to have all of the answers. I was in a large Border’s once and ran into a huge PDL display. There were dozens of copies of Warren’s books and other related to PDL. Yancey has written dozens of books, but after scouring the shelves I found just one copy of one book. As far as I’m concerned, if it can’t be faulted with anything else, PDL certainly takes up valuable shelf space in book stores that could be used by more useful books.
Comment by: David H
35Correction, Yancey has written more than a dozen books. Note to self: proof better before hitting submit.
Comment by: Julie Marie
36ok, so we have a new abbreviation going on here - to add to MTWABP and ROAA (make the world a better place and range of acceptable answers) we have HHJJ (happy happy joy joy).
communities will create their own languages, won’t they?
Comment by: Karen
37I guess the big question is:
Can we MTWABP by eschewing HHJJ and embracing life outside the ROAA?
;-)
Comment by: NCxian
38David, have you read his new book on prayer? I have been trying to decide whether to get my reading group to try it out.
Comment by: NCxian
39Swings and what???
Comment by: David H
40NCxian, I haven’t read Yancey’s new book. I didn’t even know it was out, truth be told. However, I just ran through the review and customer comments at Amazon. The last review, which was most negative, convinces me it is probaby a good book for a reading group or Sunday School discussion.
The writer faults Yancey for straying outside the fold (church tradition, modern fundementalism and even outside Christianity) in sources he cites for insight on prayer. He also is unhappy at Yancey’s hints about a God who doesn’t guide every bullet or bolt of lightning. Still he praises Yancey for attempting to deal with some of the deeply difficult issues about prayer.
That certainly seems like the stuff to spark a good discussion. And speaking just for myself, I would be worried if Yancey’s books were completely pleasing to Christian conservatives. I am heartened by his efforts to be searching and honest even if that alienates what was once a core constituency.
Comment by: Julie Marie
41lol Karen :)
Comment by: benjamin ady
42Karen–me too–we did that whole pledge to the American Flag, pledge to the “Christian flag”, and pledge to the Bible thing growing up…god “those people” in that little church and private school I grew up in still strike me as *so* scary. Occasionally I walk into a church service or some other gathering where something about the ambience or the clothing or something reminds me in some way of them and I get this almost panic thing going on at a very basic emotional level and I have to very methodically and gently calm myself.
Helen, if the pledge to the american flag wierds you out, you’d be really wierded out by the other two. Lots of American churches have both of these flags prominently displayed. My wife, who is from Australia and spent three years in UK as a child also finds it all quite strange. Here’s a picture and a little about the “Christian Flag”
I see that my intuitive avoidance of PDL was correct–that is, based on what’s been said here describing the book, I would have just found it really off putting had I read it.
Comment by: Ir
43Benjamin, my kids did AWANA (a conservative Christian kids club) for a while and they said two pledges there, as I recall.
They are both too old now and neither of them wanted to join the church’s 6th-8th grade youth club so we’re all completely out of church now. When I stopped going I asked them if they minded and once I’d made it clear that they didn’t have to pretend they did they said ‘no’.
They seem to have survived their experiences there so I’m glad ;-). I’ve had a little interaction with the worship pastor of my ex-church this year by e-mail and he’s urged me to send them, if not to that church, to another one.
I didn’t tell him this, but I couldn’t help thinking: “Why should I? You don’t send your kids to ‘atheist class’!”
My children are 11 and 13 and I’m not going to make them go to church or Christian class or youth group if they don’t want to. I already make them do enough things that they don’t always want to do, on the basis that those things are ‘good for them’. And I can’t feel at all sure that church experience will be ‘good for them’ anyway.
Comment by: NCxian
44I have always found Yancey’s books to be good for a “mixed crowd” (somewhat liberal to somewhat conservative). His general approach is thoroughly orthodox, which encourages the conservative folks to join in, but he raises a lot of questions in a very thoughtful way. Reading his books with a group helps broaden the Range of Acceptable Answers, IMO. (Which is becoming my life’s work, apparently!)
For my own part, I am always blown away by his research. He reports in The Jesus I Never Knew that he sat in some seminary library for months and read through every book on Jesus! What is that old phrase–”great work if you can get it”?
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
45NCxian, re: roundabouts -
explaining the expression “it’s swings and roundabouts”
photo of a roundabout
I have some of Philip Yancey’s books and have enjoyed his emphasis on grace, on ‘love your neighbor’ and on dealing honestly with the picture of Jesus we find when we actually read the gospels.
Comment by: David H
46Yancey has somewhat of a journalists background — former editor of Christianity Today. I have always been impressed by his journalistic approach to what he is writing. He doesn’t shrink at going to where the action is to source his writing. And he scares me with all of the pertinent references he can hold in his head. I have trouble getting to all of his books because of all the other books he reminds me I need to read.
Comment by: Karen
47Benjamin:
Oh, man, can I relate to that feeling! How about that churchy smell that’s in certain buildings? Just that musty odor alone can freak me out … ;-)
Helen wrote:
My boys stopped attending a year or so ago. They were in the jr high/high school group and absolutely hated it. My husband really objected to their quitting, but they’ve certainly heard the gospel and been thoroughly exposed to Christianity over the years so it seems to me they have enough information to decide for themselves what they think about religion.
What doesn’t make sense to me is this: My church’s doctrine said that god brings people to himself and the holy spirit works in believers’ lives to save them. So, why not trust that process? Why is there all this urgency amongst Christian parents about making children attend church? Isn’t it contradictory on some level?
Comment by: David H
48Karen, I cousin of mine who would probably call himself a fundementalist, once told me that everything else in the world was attempting to indoctrinate his children. He felt he deserved first crack at that. He also told me that when kids are young they don’t know how to assess things properly to make decisions for themselves. Thus it was doubly important for him to indoctrinate them early on.
In some ways his heart seemed to be in the right place. And there was a grain of truth to his thought process, you don’t reason with a 2-year-old about why not to run into traffic, you simply tell them “no” and devote some effort to making sure they can’t ignore your no. However, with my own children I have hoped to provide them with a foundation and enough security to be able to withstand indoctrination from every corner — even mine.
Comment by: Julie Marie
49my old church just built a multi million dollar addition and it is all children’s space. the rationale was if you don’t get them in before they are teens then statistically the chances are low that they will ever know the Lord.
Like your cousin, David, I felt it was my responsibility to teach my son our faith. We chose Cody’s guardians with a careful eye to who would faithfully continue his spiritual growth. When we talked of moving back to VA,the hardest part was leaving our church.
I’m in the third quarter of a crisis of faith now, and while I can’t say for sure where I will land - I know I no longer fret that by neglecting the fundamentalist training my former church is cutting edge equipped to give I am putting him at risk of missing salvation.
I have a different goal now. I still want him to know about God, but not the God held up by the churches necessarily, I want him to meet the God I am discovering, a God in the Bible, yes, but not bound by the Bible, a God whose plan is so simple we should allbe able to participate. I’ll teach him the bible stories differently than I was taught, but I will also teach him to question. I was raised to obey without question. I like seeing all the quesitons people ask here, and I like hearing how others answer. I want my son to learn to do this; to question, listen, refine the question…
Comment by: Roy Gathercoal
50hello, all. There is so much going on here that strikes close to my heart.
I hope it is OK to join in a little.
I was also raised a fundamentalist. By the time I finished college (at a Christian school where the administration was pretty much fund., but the interesting faculty were not.) I had decided to dump the organized religion thing.
I hadn’t really lost faith–in fact my faith in God was probably better than ever–but I wasn’t so sure the church was even on the positive side of neutral. (I still have a much lower tolerance of “mindless fundamentalism” than does my wife, who grew up Roman Catholic, which the funds. were always trashing).
I did find a place I was comfortable, and where a lot of folks were good about nodding when the fundys talked, then getting back to paying attention when they quit and someone else spoke.
It was one of my “ahhhhhh” moments.
No more debates–no more pulling my hair out. . . I just keep remembering the old story about wrestling with a pig in the mud. Eventually you realize that you are just as muddy as the pig and that the pig likes it better. . .
Thanks for the breath of fresh air.
Comment by: NCxian
51Glad to have you here, Roy!
Did your ahhh moment influence you to stay with the nodding group, or to leave?