A Great Site Returns

Posted by Siamang on: 11.13.2006 /

Here’s a science post. Don’t worry, it’s fun!

Olduvai George is the website of Carl Buell. Carl is one of the foremost natural history illustrators working today. The work he does is really wonderful from an artistic standpoint.

His knowlege of animal anatomy using modern animals pays off dividends when he sets out to illustrate animals that we only know from the fossil record.

When drawing an extinct animal, he first needs to get the best information he can on the fossil skeleton of the animal. He plans out his painting with the precise skeletal dimensions of the animal in mind. Then he starts building the animal up from there.

To do this, he relies on two different and very important rules of biology: homology and analogy. We’ll get back to that in a minute.

The difficulty in rendering an animal that hasn’t seen daylight in a few million years is that we have no photographs. So Carl has to start building the animal in his mind. He’s not totally in the dark there, there are two places he can look. First, he can see if the animal has living relatives, and see how they’re constructed. This gives him a good grounding in the anatomy of the animal. If the animal is a transitional form… say from a hippo-like creature to a whale-like creature.. he can study the modern descendents and get some understanding. If he can see how the bones of a modern whale relate to the outward appearance of a whale, he can start to see how his proto-whales might have looked.

The other thing he has working for him is evolutionary relay. Evolutionary relay is when different species evolve similar structures as a result of interaction in their environment. For example, fins. Dolphins are mammals, but they have fins like fish. So does this guy, neither a fish nor a mammal:

Tylosaurus lived during the Upper Cretaceous period, around 65 million years ago, and was not a dinosaur, but rather closely related to snakes and monitor lizards. You can see where Carl has woven in the likeness of both the monitor lizard and the flippers of something resembling a walrus.

Like other aquatic animals, Tylosaurus was adapted for aquatic life, and those adaptations serve Carl well…. he knows which animals to look at to see what carpals and metacarpals do when they become a flipper.

So those are the two rules of homology and analogy. Homology is a feature shared between two animals as a result of common ancestry. For example, you and I are mammals, and we share our mammalian traits with the cats of the world because of a distant relative.

Analogy is when a feature is shared, but for reasons unrelated to ancestry. Features that evolved seperately in different lineages are called analogous. For example, wings in birds, which evolved from the forelimbs of dinosars, are analogous to wings in insects, which may have evolved from gill-like structures in water bugs. Some features are so successful, they have evolved seperately many, many times in the history of life on earth. The eye, for example, may have evolved seperately as many as 40 times.

Using homology and analogy, Carl can bring to life these wonderful creatures for us.

I called this post “A Great Site Returns,” and that’s because Carl hasn’t been posting for awhile. It’s sad and ironic that while Carl brings these wonderful animals to life for us, he lost the life of his beloved dog, Tito. Read his past blog entrys to get to know who Tito was, and how special an animal he was. The loss of Tito was one part of a very complex, difficult time for Carl. But I’m mightly glad he’s back sharing his art with us.

Thanks for coming back, Carl. We appreciate it!

-SIAMANG

15 Responses to "A Great Site Returns"

  • Comment by: Karen

    1 11/13/06 11:32 AM | Comment Link |

    How totally cool! I always wondered where the illustrators came up with the pictures of extinct animals. Now I know. Thanks. :-)

  • Comment by: NCxian

    2 11/13/06 1:38 PM | Comment Link |

    I clicked on Olduvai George 30 minutes ago. I would have posted a thanks for such a cool site shortly thereafter, but for my 7 year old daughter. She caught sight of the screen as I was scrolling past the cooper’s hawk pictures, and I eventually gave up trying to the get the computer back. She has been turning her head side to side, and using a tiny imaginery brush to reproduce the brushstrokes on the screen. Then she moves on to something else that strikes her fancy and tries to kinesthetically imagine how it was drawn.

    So, since she has one million times the capacity to notice detail as I do, I will convey her appreciation of the site. Her opinion on this sort of thing is a lot more worthwhile than mine!

  • Comment by: cautious

    3 11/13/06 2:18 PM | Comment Link |

    yeah, that website rocks.

    And it is good to see a mosasaur on this webpage!

  • Comment by: Siamang

    4 11/13/06 3:36 PM | Comment Link |

    Yeah, I love how he breaks down a painting and lets you see how he went about painting it.

    Yeah, thanks to you, cautious, I’m much more circumspect on calling all large extinct “-osaurs” dinos!

  • Comment by: cautiousmaniac

    5 11/13/06 6:37 PM | Comment Link |

    My favorite “-osaurus” that is not at all a dinosaur is the archaeocete Basilosaurus. Not that I fault the name at all - an American scientist in the early 1800’s named it that, and how could he have known that whales once looked so odd!

  • Comment by: Siamang

    6 11/14/06 12:13 AM | Comment Link |

    Wow! COOL! Basilosaurus! Dang, that’s one ferocious beastie!

  • Comment by: Ir (Helen)

    7 11/14/06 8:51 AM | Comment Link |

    These illustrations are awesome - thanks for posting this Siamang!

  • Comment by: Karen

    8 11/14/06 6:47 PM | Comment Link |

    Wow! COOL! Basilosaurus! Dang, that’s one ferocious beastie!

    Is that anything like the Basilisk monster of Harry Potter fame? J.K. Rowling is absolutely fantastic with giving people and things wonderful, evocative names.

  • Comment by: Carl Buell (OGeorge)

    9 11/15/06 5:04 PM | Comment Link |

    THANK YOU so much, Siamang(?) and everyone who commented. What a great write-up, I’ll try to live up to it in future posts.

  • Comment by: Siamang

    10 11/15/06 5:23 PM | Comment Link |

    Hey, thanks for stopping by, Carl! BTW, did you ever do a painting of Basilosaurus?

    Karen, the Basilisk is a mythological monster from way, way back.

    I don’t think the Basilosaurus was named after it.

  • Comment by: Carl Buell (OGeorge)

    11 11/15/06 7:42 PM | Comment Link |

    Hey Siamang, I’ve done Basilosaurus a number of times. Actually, I’m very soon going to do a number of posts on Cetacean evolution and the phylogeny of present species. One of my recent projects (still ongoing) is with a group of scientists, both paleontologists and microbiologists, deciphering relationships between fossil and living whales and dolphins. Lots of neat fossil species including Basilosaurus, Durodon, and of course Ambulocetus to paint. All new reconstructions including what looks like the first baleen whale, Aetiocetus. Stay tuned!

    Both the Basil-o-saurus and the Basil-isk lizard get their names from the same mythological beast that was the supposed “King of Serpents”.

    And thanks again so much for the link and the post.

  • Comment by: Siamang

    12 11/15/06 10:08 PM | Comment Link |

    Wow, I can’t wait!

    Our own Cautiousmaniac is quite an officianado of whale evolution (I think he’s doing some research in that field).

    I myself just read that chapter of Ancestor’s Tale. Quite amazing how those relationships are shaking out!

  • Comment by: cautiousmaniac

    13 11/16/06 7:00 AM | Comment Link |

    I am not doing research in whale paleo, but my school does have a whale systematics lab, and one of the students there is one of my flatmates, so I get to second-hand hear and learn about aetiocetids.

    The transformation of some artiodactyl into a group of sea-going creatures is one of the more amazing tales of evolution, and I think that paleoartists have done an amazing job of helping to advertise and promote the research that is being done. Paleoartists recognize the power of illustrating good science.

    …well, except for the paleoartists who work for the Creation Museum. But they’re funny like that.

  • Comment by: Siamang

    14 11/16/06 10:27 AM | Comment Link |

    Lol,

    Hey, I wonder if Carl might weigh in on the OkapiGiraffe Kind! Or the Woolly Mastedelephant!

  • Comment by: Siamang

    15 11/30/06 10:34 AM | Comment Link |

    Carl has a post on cetacean evolution today, with some wonderful images.

    http://olduvaigeorge.com/2006/11/22/how-do-you-get-this/