Posted by Jason on: 06.05.2008 /
I have four children. The eldest is 13 next month and the youngest turned 10 a few months ago. They are of an age where they have a lot of information in their heads and they are forming opinions of their own. Many of their opinions, unsurprisingly, match my own. All well and good you might think.
I don’t want them to have my opinions though. I want them to have their own opinions. I want them to consider their own values and form ideas that are compatible with them. I want to argue with them and disagree with them and, most importantly, I want to respect them for what they believe in. I do not want my children to be atheists in order to please me. I do not want my children to be atheists because they think that I’m right. I want them to think that they’re right and to have considered fully their own beliefs.
For me atheism isn’t merely a lack of belief in God or gods. Every child has that until they are taught about religion. To me atheism is a considered view that there are no gods. It isn’t enough to simply fail to believe or not to care if there are gods or not. To label myself an atheist I have examined, and indeed I continue to examine, the belief systems of different religions. Ultimately I have rejected them as fact. To me they are simply insufficient to base a life on. That isn’t saying that there isn’t anything in religion that has value. There are certainly some good ideas in many faiths. Religion though doesn’t have a monopoly on good ideas and no one religion, for me, has shown itself to be superior to the others.
In the process of investigating faiths I have been drawn to aspects of many. The peaceful nature of Buddhism, the reverence of nature in Wicca, the passion of Norse mythology, the harsh justice of Greek mythology, the spirituality of the Dreamtime, the fun of Native American tales and the wisdom of African mythology. I appreciate the tenacity of Christianity too. I’ve adopted what I consider to be worthwhile into my own life. I consider this to have added a degree of richness to my life that provides added colour and depth to my experiences.
I want my own children to share in that richness and colour. That is why I want them to explore the world and find their own way, to question their assumptions rather than just accept them. I don’t want them to be atheists; I want them to discover for themselves a path that suits them. If that is atheism or a faith like Christianity then I’ll be content that they’ve chosen that in an informed way rather than simply fallen into it.
Comment by: Randy
1Beautiful, Jason. That’s what I want for my kids, too. It’s not easy to let them figure stuff out on their own, but a faith (or no faith) that is simply mimicking their parents is inauthentic at best. I have seen hundreds of late adolescents who seemed deeply entrenched in the faith of their parents simply walk away from that “faith” once they were out of the house, as if it were just another required behavior they couldn’t now justify on their own. Of course, many of those found their own version of the same faith later…on their own…but at least then it was something real and personal to them.
My own parents determined they would not influence me or my siblings in any way in regards to religion (they had none anyway, so this was more of a copout than a strategy, I think). The idea sounds nice and respectful, but if a child is to make an informed choice about something that is so significant, we parents must ensure that they have adequate information to do so. It sounds like this is your strategy, so I commend you for caring enough to invest some time in helping them make that INFORMED decision…on their own, but with your help (and the help of lots of others, probably since it really does take a village to raise a child).
Thanks, Jason.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
2Very interesting - thanks for sharing this, Jason!
Can we see a bigger photo of you and your family? :)
I used to want my children to be Christians but now I want them to be people who understand how to do research and evaluate data and evidence. So that their conclusions and positions and viewpoints are well-informed. I’d also like them to be responsible caring people - and so far I’m very pleased by what I hear back from their teachers about how they help other students - and their grades indicate they’re responsible about getting their work done. I also hope they will find things to do as adults so they’ll be fulfilled and happy.
What I want sounds similar to what you want for your children. But feel free to point out any differences you see!
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
3Randy I like that you aren’t pushy with your children about what they believe. Was that hard when you were more of a traditional evangelist? Do you pray that your children will be followers of Jesus?
A few years ago - probably when I was having doubts and reexamining what I believed - I realized I was not happy about what my children would learn at church because it seemed that they would learn Bible verses rather than character. I want them to learn good character. Also, they’d learn “accept this because it’s in the Bible” rather than “you can examine this as much as you like, as skeptically as you like - and in the end make up your own mind”.
Did your children go to church with you? Do you think they were encouraged to make informed decisions by their teachers at church or to believe what they were told because it was true? I’m asking because like I said, I realized a few years ago that what I wanted for my kids was at odds with what they were learning there. Not just because of content but also the way it was presented.
Comment by: Jason
4I’ve edited the photo so that clicking on it opens a new window with more detail.
Randy, having them walk away and reject my beliefs would be a snub but having them leave home and find beliefs of their own, even if they were incompatible with my own, would be great.
Helen, I would think that any parent would want their children to be well rounded and content individuals. We all want the best for our progeny.
Comment by: Karen
5Jason, very nice article! I agree with you. Does your partner feel the same way? Was she raised in a religious background?
Now, call me crazy, but it looks like there are five cute kids in that photo. If I had to guess I’d say that Bethany is the odd one out (a friend along for the day?).
You guys really had them close together! Is there a set of twins in there?
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
6Karen I’m glad you said that because I counted five also :) I agree about cute, too - Jason you have a lovely family!
Comment by: Jason
7Karen, my nephew Sean is on the end. Actually it’s Baby Sean and he’ll probably keep that nickname when he’s 6′6″ and 200 lbs. Tasha and Alexander are the twins. That’s the very tall boy and his older but tiny sister. We did have them close together, all in three years. Which is fun. I put some alt text on the image to explain.
Hil’s mother is religious but not in an evangelical way. Her father is silent on religion as you’d expect a good German to be. Hil herself is more amused by religion than anything else. She thinks that creationism is “a funny idea” whereas I think it is madness.
Comment by: Jason
8Thank you, Helen, I think that they’re lovely too.
Comment by: Elizabeth Chapin
9Great ideas about teaching our kids to think. While I have fully indoctrinated my kids into the Christian faith - Sunday school since before they were born - I also expose them to other faiths and expect them to make a rational choice as adults about whether to be Christ followers or not. I have four girls, ages 9,11, 13, and 15. I was exposed to the Christian faith as a child but after my parents divorced, we did not attend church on a regular basis. In college I explored many options, including atheism. I highly value teaching my children to think for themselves and agree with Jason, I want my kids to
I think far too many Christians (and I am speaking of Christians because I am most familiar with this group of people) teach their children to do and think what they are told, instead of teaching them to be responsible, thinking people. This is one of the greatest tragedies of many faith communities. I think this is a very important topic for all parents and appreciate this post.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
10Elizabeth, I didn’t know you had four children too! Thanks for your comment.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
11Jason wrote:
That’s good because your opinion about your children matters to them a lot more than mine!
Comment by: Rev. Dan
12@Jason:
Nice crew! Props to you for providing a solid foundation for them to grow upon. Cheers!
I have no children (that I’m aware of) and I’m not going to reproduce. (I guess that makes me a “self-correcting problem.” :) )
Comment by: Rev. Dan
13p.s. I’m not a fan of the new editing thing. The former one worked better in Safari.
Comment by: Jason
14Elizabeth, four daughters? Crumbs. ;)
You say you explored not having a faith, can I ask what made you reject that in the end? My experience is that people tend to stick with atheism once it is given serious consideration. Even people who explore a variety of faiths usually end up either forming their own ideas in a deist sort of way or rejecting them all.
Helen, honestly the only opinion that matters about my children is their own. My opinion and the opinion of their peers is just a bonus.
Rev. Dan, no plans to reproduce eh? Doing your bit for population control? If so you’re much more responsible than Elizabeth and I who are adding to the global problem of overcrowding and dwindling resources. I should hang my head in shame. ;) Or maybe you just don’t like the little ankle biters.
We don’t all have that urge to propagate our species. My partner, Hil, is certainly not a cooing maternal hen. I doubt that she’d have chosen to have kids at all if it wasn’t for my terrible influence.
Comment by: Stephan
15Jason, I also have twins - it’s quite a trip. You have a beautiful family.
While I hope that my children choose to follow Christ, and I am leading them in that direction, I hope they arrive there by challenging the beliefs that are presented to them, as I have. I share with them my own struggles, so they know it is ok to question and doubt. They have all “prayed the prayer” for what it’s worth, but I fully expect that each of them will have one or more crises of faith in their life that may or may not lead them to another conclusion. Whichever it is, I hope they reach it by sincere thought and exploration rather than simply falling back on the default position for lack of something better.
Comment by: Rev. Dan
16@Jason:
Honestly, my decision to not reproduce has a lot more to do with the fact that I would be the world’s worst parent (perhaps second only to my own) than any of the reasons you mention.
As it stands I’m doing my best to get along with adults and find that to be challenging enough. No human being deserves to come into the world to find themselves cared for by me. ;)
I’m sorry that I seem to have given off the impression that everything in my head has a negative slant towards others. I have vented here, but I do like y’all.
Agree with? Not necessarily.
Like/admire? Hells yeah.
Comment by: Jason
17Stephan, twins are easier to manage, in my experience, than singletons. As babies they don’t clamour for as much attention. I may well be comparing them to Beth though. She (almost literally) screamed for the first three months of her little life. So much rage in so tiny a body and we can barely get her to talk at all now. ;)
Rev. Dan, of course it would be terribly rude of me to suggest that anyone would be a bad parent. Showing that you are aware of the pitfalls is a good sign though. Hil works with vulnerable kids and parents and the worst parents are honestly those who think that they aren’t doing anything wrong. They refuse to take advice or change their behaviour even when it is at its most destructive.
Comment by: Stephan
18Jason, it sounds like your experience with kids has been similar to mine. Our first was a screamer, to the point that my wife and I would stare at each other blankly and ask, “What have we done?”. He was, and continues to be, rather high maintenance. Our girls, by comparison, were less work together than our son was all by himself. That may be as much a function of gender as anything else, but it sure clears up the misconception that they come into the world as blank slates.
Comment by: Rev. Dan
19@Jason:
I don’t see where you wrote anything that even remotely suggested that. I coughed it up (about myself) on my own! :)
Comment by: Rev. Dan
20Yup. I had a roommate once who started dating a “single mom” who had two kids. They all were sitting in the living room one day when I walked through on my way out, to observe the little toddler boy laying on the carpet with duct tape on his wrists and on his mouth. The mom, the roommate, and the sister were all sitting around him in a circle looking down on him like it was some sort of macabre nativity scene.
I said “WTF?!?!?” (A LOT more than this, mind you.)
Long story short, I left and called the cops. (I couldn’t stand to be there when the cops showed up and I felt it was important to ensure that the cops actually witnessed this firsthand.) I talked to one of the cops outside afterwards and he told me that the mom admitted that they’d duct taped the boy’s hands and mouth as “discipline” for getting into stuff he shouldn’t (aka “being a toddler.”). The cop told me that the mother had seemed really perplexed that anyone would consider that to be an “inappropriate form of discipline” and had shown them the duct tape they used to restrain the toddler, etc. The cop told me that they’d called Child Protective Services and that the mother would be receiving counseling.
The roommate, who worked nights and had left the house right after the incident, woke me up at 3 am, screaming and yelling at me that I was a liar, blah, blah, blah because he “wasn’t abusing a child.” I almost pushed him off the balcony.
That living arrangement ended poorly, to say the least.
It amazes me that you have to have a license to drive a car but you can pop out babies as often as you like.
Comment by: Mike O
21Good one!
I just watched a really good movie last night called “Gone, Baby. Gone.” It’s about a bad mother whose 4 year old daughter is kidnapped, and the emotional crisis of bringing that innocent child back into that environment.
My only begotten son, Zack, whom some of you have met, will be 20 in November. He was raised in a Christian home with all the Christian trappings. With my wife and I both being heavily involved in church, and he went to a Christian school. But with that said, when he got to around 18 or so, he started pushing back pretty hard. He has since rethought - and continues to think through - his faith. He’s still a Christian, and I expect he will remain so, but my wife and I have never squelched his desire to search.
While he lived under our roof, we did make him go to church, but that was just a “family rule” type thing. Since moving out last August, I’ll bet he hasn’t been to church more that 4 or 5 times, and that’s when he’s home with us. We don’t make him go any more - he’s 19 and that would be irresponsible of us - but he sometimes goes with us because a) it makes us happy and b) he doesn’t disagree. He’s pushing back really hard on the structure, formality and “religion” of being a Christian, but he is truly a Christ follower - whatever that means for a 19-20 year old.
I am especially proud of him because he’s got a good head on his shoulders. He’s smart and he’s not afraid to disagree with mom and dad on topics of faith. He’s a young man now.
Jason, when you said this:
That’s me, too - except we’re taling Christianity rather than atheism. And now that my son is entering adulthood, I have that. And it feels really really good to know that he doesn’t have an unthinking, forced belief system. He has rejected some of the “forms of religion” that my wife and i find comfort in (church activities, pastoral hassles, etc), but his faith is stronger now (I think) because he had the freedom to come to his own conclusions (with a little direction from mom and dad, no doubt).
But I’m proud to say that he doesn’t “share my faith.” It’s his, and we happen to agree on much of it.
Comment by: Jason
22Stephan, it certainly is a misconception that kids are born as blank slates. All of my kids have had distinct personalities since birth. Obviously they’ve developed and changed over the years but there was certainly a base from which to build on.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
23Rev. Dan wrote:
Rev. Dan, wow, I’m so glad you called the cops about that toddler.
And I’m sorry your roommate got mad at you rather than accepting responsibility, even though he was in the room when it was going on.
Comment by: Randy
24Sorry for being absent from the party for a bit…I’m on a road trip on my Harley up in rainy Seattle (rain in Seattle…who’da thunk?).
Anyway, Helen…Yes, I was a bit more, uh, “pushy” with my kids when I was younger (and when they were, thankfully). We had them go to church with us, not so much for educational purposes but because we viewed the church as our family and Sunday morning we went to hang with our family. At 14 I had to let go of forcing my oldest son to join us, which was good for everyone. He was quite shocked by the release, but he simply made life hell for all of us on Sunday mornings (and honestly most other days of the week, too).
I do want my kids to fall in love with Jesus, but since love is something you can’t really push people into, I must trust Jesus for the outcome of that and hope I don’t paint an unwarranted picture of him for them. My oldest son, as you know, does not believe (except in a rather fuzzy notion of god), but has great respect for me and for my faith. My daughter is an emergent type believer (meaning a bit disillusioned with church, but willing to radically follow Jesus), and my youngest son is unclear about much, including what he believes.
As Jason said in the post just ahead of me, all three are incredibly unique from each other. They all look a bit like me, which is comforting (I’d suspect my wife was fooling around otherwise), but they are as different from each other as night and day…with the same parents and environments and upbringing.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
25Rev. Dan wrote:
I’d be surprised if you’d really be that bad a parent. However since parenting is so challenging I think it makes sense not to take it on if you have strong reservations about it beforehand. Otherwise you won’t even be able to remind yourself why you thought this was a good idea when you’ve been up all night with a sick child, or are in the midst of some other parenting challenge.
I really wanted children but I also think my parenting falls short in lots of ways. At least I’ve never tried ‘duct tape discipline’.
That reminds me: Casper (as in Matt Casper the atheist who went to church with Jim and they wrote a book about it) has a band called “Hell Yeah”.
Comment by: Rev. Dan
26I’m in no way defending the guy’s actions*, but I think it’s a good illustration of what Jason meant by “some people aren’t aware of the fact that they’re truly bad parents.”** I’d argue that in some ways that’s true of my parents as well. I’m not willing to cut them slack for what they’ve done (largely because they won’t even accept the fact that they were truly wrong) but I don’t think they had me with the intent of being bad parents. In fact, they really, really wanted to have a child but their desire/wants were misplaced, unrealistic, and ultimately really wrong.
My parents tried for 14 years to have a baby. (One day my dad realized… “oh, I probably shouldn’t wear a prophylactic if we’re trying to conceive”)*** I think a fundamental problem is that they got a human being instead of a puppy.
The law (in the U.S.) essentially treats children as property. As long as you feed, clothe, and shelter them and also make sure they go to school, you don’t have to do anything above and beyond that. I’m certain of this because my parents used to regularly abuse the “justice system” and call the police to have me hauled away because I’d argue about stuff like “cleaning my room.” The police would show up and haul me away without so much as asking me a question. I have no idea how many times I ended up in handcuffs because my parents would call and use the “magic take my kid away” words.
My parents had me intentionally so I really consider them to be especially responsible for not investing the time and effort required to create a good foundation upon which to build a family. They had material resources which allowed them to raise me in an upper-working-class family (I had all the cool toys… Star Wars, Lego, GI Joe… I had no lack of “stuff”) but they lacked the ability to provide a home.
My mother (I guess I’m softening on my use of vocabulary a bit) used to regularly tell me how much she resented cleaning me up as a toddler (changing my diaper and the like) and frequently asserted that I owed her love and respect because of that. After hearing this for the umpteen billionth time I came to an appreciation of that fact that I absolutely owed her nothing. The fact that she changed my diapers means that she was acting at least semi-responsibility for the choices and decisions that SHE had made. At least I got that much out of the situation.
Seriously, my parents should have just gotten a dog. In fact, I think that’s what my parents thought raising a child would be like. You could just throw the dog in the back yard and ignore it as long as it had food/water, and It’d be fun to go out and throw the ball around every now and then. Dogs treated that way are always happy to see you and don’t really seem to think about the fact that they were kicked last week. Human beings, though, remember and have personalities of their own.
It seems very strange to me that they decided to take a class on parenting when I was 14-15. I mocked them for days when they brought home their parenting class completion certificate. It was a brilliant example of their disconnect from reality. Perhaps I should have given them credit for at least trying, but that effort seemed to be mmm… about 15-16 years too late. To me, it’s akin to showing up with a bucket to help scoop out all the water after the Titanic had already hit the iceberg and was partially submerged.
One of my friends and his wife are going to have a baby soon. He’d told me, well before they conceived, that if there were going to have a baby that there were things he needed to change in his life to prepare for it. He and his wife went to some counseling, started reading books, started eating more healthily, he stopped smoking, etc. It’s people like them who totally should have children. Their kid is going to be awesome because my friend and his wife are setting their lives up as a launching pad for another human life. My parents, I believe, thought that I would be fill-dirt to smooth over the holes in their lives.****
Thanks for the nice counter-assertion, but I am absolutely certain that I’d be a bad parent… not because I’d want to be a bad parent but because I have huge “blind spots” which I’m not really even aware of. Talkin’ with y’all has been a good mirror in that regard… I’ve come to appreciate a couple of things about myself that could use some work that I hadn’t really considered before (or had overlooked). Thanks for that, all, and especially Helen.
I’m truthfully far too “broken” to ever be a parent. I still think it’s possible though to heal enough that it’d be possible to have a healthy relationship with someone else and I’m doing a lot better with interpersonal relationships on the whole. A therapist once told me that he was pleasantly surprised to hear that I’ve been able to maintain long-term relationships (I still have friends from Jr. High School) because folks who have issues similar to mine typically aren’t able to.
I’m absolutely certain that these holes exist (though I don’t see or understand some of them) because evidence of their effects has shown up time and time again in my relationships. In some cases, I’m totally unaware that how I was treated was completely wrong and think it was normal or acceptable behavior. I’d appreciate any good thoughts/help towards figuring some of that stuff out… it’s painful, lonely, and it sucks. Why would I inflict that upon another human being, especially one who would totally be dependent upon me? I’m just not that immoral.
I’m making NO assertions about ANYBODY else’s parenting skills via indirect reference/innuendo or passive-aggressive comments, I’m just talking about my own experience. While I think that’s self-apparent, I’d prefer to err on the side of clarity. I’m not here to sling mud, on the contrary I’m quite grateful that some of you are willing to get “dirty” and talk with me (or more accurately, perhaps, you’re willing to “listen”). Thank you for that. :)
* That dude was one of the worst roommates ever. During the really negative process of getting him out of my life he threw away a huge box of my photographs and negatives. I think intentionally and willfully destroying someone else’s permanent records and documentation of their life and memories is one of the more evil things one can do.
** Paraphrased.
*** Not really. The prophylactic bit is a joke; the other parts are legit.
**** This is a pretty apt description, because they truly treated me like dirt.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
27Rev. Dan, what you said about your parents wanting you - good point; I think wanting a baby is necessary but not sufficient: how’s that? :)
I believed you when you said they weren’t good parents but, wow, calling the police to take you away in handcuffs when you didn’t behave? Resenting you because your diapers needed changing! That’s awful :(
Anyway I expect you’ll enjoy seeing your friends treat their baby as a baby should be treated. And I think they’ll enjoy sharing their baby with you. Having nieces and nephews or having friends with children is a good way for someone not wanting to take on parenthood to experience children. And parents of young children are grateful for friends who enjoy their children and can perhaps provide breaks for them sometimes by being alternate entertainment for their children.
You’re definitely on the right track already - you know your parents didn’t raise you as they should have, even if you haven’t thought through all the details of what was ok and what wasn’t, and you know it was very wrong of your roommate to destroy your photos and negatives. (And you knew the duct tape on the toddler was very wrong)
I think as you continue to share your story in safe places, you’ll become clearer and clearer about what was ok and what wasn’t.
If you’re open to counseling some people say that helps a lot. It’s a weird thing about counseling: even though you’re paying the person to listen and be empathetic it still makes you feel better so it’s worth it :). I see one for mental health reasons (ever since I was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder). I like knowing that he is never going to be be impatient with me because he’s having a bad day or too busy to listen. Which happens with other people, since they’re human.
A good counselor can help you distinguish normal from wrong and also help you see what you’re doing in your life now to try to change the past or fix what isn’t fixable.
But I think there’s rarely just one way to accomplish something. I’m just throwing that out as something that some people find helpful.
It’s because you’re not that immoral that I suspect you’d be a good parent! Sort of a catch-22 perhaps :) It’s your choice - I’m not going to try to change your mind.
I don’t know how old you are but maybe this will encourage you - I had a friend who had no idea her Mom was extremely mean to her until she was 40. I don’t remember what opened her eyes. Anyway, once she realized that she could start healing. Until she was 40 she kept trying to please her Mom, not realizing it would never work.
Now she’s realized her Mom is not pleasable by her and it’s not her fault, she’s set free from trying to please her and can move on to more productive endeavors!
Comment by: Mike O
28This might be a bit of a stretch for you, Dan, but pretty much all of my resources are Christian. But we did a series on John Eldridges “Wild at Heart,” and that’s what it’s about - getting past the wounds of your father (parents, in your case). Of ocurse it’s got the whole Christian bent to it that I know you’re not keen on, but …
Oh, and I want to add that while we maybe didn’t hit it off too good at the beginning (I made that “why the rage?” comment in my first post to you), but I’m starting to “get” you. You’re OK, man. You’re pretty OK in my book.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
29Randy thanks for sharing more about your kids and how you raised them
Why would you do that? Jesus had tattoos and rode a motorbike, didn’t he? :)
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
30Mike, I’ve heard many (Christian) guys enthuse about Wild at Heart (including my ex-pastor).
To me it comes across as presupposing men are a certain way that church often doesn’t affirm. Men who agree like the book because it affirms them and reassures them that they weren’t crazy to feel that church was trying to fit them in a box they didn’t fit into. For them it’s very freeing.
But I could see other men thinking “Eldredge’s box doesn’t fit me either” - I don’t think the book will be very helpful to them.
Personally I found it rather sexist. (I wrote about on CatE when it was first opened, here)
(Oh, here’s one other thing about Wild At Heart - I noticed that Eldredge uses Iron John as a resource, a weird pagan book about the archetypes of man, which centers around pagan gods and goddesses. I said to some Christians, “don’t you care that this presents a view of men derived at least in part from pagan mythology?” Rather than the Bible? I couldn’t find any who cared which disappointed me. Then I read another Eldredge book supposedly based on a Christian viewpoint but mostly its approach to spiritual growth was, figure out the movie character you want to be like. Eldredge is too ‘out there’ for me. Sorry - you probably didn’t know Eldredge was on my list of most annoying Christian authors (only imo of course))
Anyway…each to his own. Mike, I appreciate you suggesting a resource for Dan which you’ve found helpful. And not least for mentioning it’s Christian.
I can imagine some Christians offering a Christian book, not mentioning it’s Christian and hoping it will influence the reader to become a Christian. I.e. it’s a covert evangelism tactic.
But you were open about it being Christian and how you realize that might be an issue for Dan. I think that’s awesome! (Even though Eldredge’s books bug me :))
Comment by: Mike O
31No, I knew WAH is not exactly on your “must read” list :) It was helpful to me, though.
As I was going to sleep last night thinking about this, I started thinking about forgiveness. You don’t have to be a Christian to forgive, and forgiveness can be very healthy and freeing - especially when the people who hurt you don’t seem to be particularly bothered by the fact that they did anything wrong - if they even know.
When you don’t forgive, you are the one who keeps the wound fresh. And it doesn’t hurt the person who wounded you, it only hurts you. They certainly don’t deserve to be forgiven, and you would be wise to remember what they did so they don’t do it again (the old adage, “forgive and forget” is not very smart in my book). Forgiving doesn’t mean you trust them - you shouldn’t because they can’t be trusted! It just means they don’t owe you anything for what they took from you. By letting it go, it frees you to move on with your life - like they probably have.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
32Mike, that’s a good point.
These days I might rather frame it as ‘letting go of being angry at people, since it makes no difference to them and makes me miserable’. As I think about it, the word ‘forgive’ pushes my buttons, I guess - it must have been used to invalidate me along the way, I guess.
I heard one time “they hurt you once but you’re hurting yourself with what they did over and over again by continuing to dwell on it.” I try to bear that in mind!
But the first stage for some people is getting angry. People like Rev Dan who start by assuming something is normal (this is a reference to what he said in his post, not me psychoanalyzing him) need to learn it isn’t and then be angry. So they can go from not being angry because they’re repressing the appropriateness of being angry, to being angry, to letting go.
It’s a process and being told to forgive too early in the process keeps people at the ‘repressed’ stage. They need space to feel what they ought to feel before choosing not to be held captive by anger any more.
I know because I listen to New Life on the radio :). It’s a Christian call-in counseling show - it’s the most sane Christian teaching on these sorts of topics I’ve ever heard. If a caller is minimizing what was done to them the hosts don’t say “Wonderful - you’re being Christian and forgiving them!” They say - hey, why aren’t you angry about this? You should be angry!” Which is pretty cool, I think, for a Christian show.
Comment by: Jason
33Rev. Dan, I don’t want you to go away with the inaccurate idea that I’m somehow a perfect parent. :)Honestly I think that anyone who says that they are is just not paying attention to what they’re doing. Like many parents, like all human beings, I make mistakes. I don’t give my kids enough attention or I’m giving them too much. I’m too strict with them unless I’m letting them get away with murder. I muddle through and try to do what’s best for everyone in the hope that, one day, they’ll understand that I’m as human and as flawed as anyone else but I did my best anyway.
I strongly suspect that they’ve gone long past the stage when I can do no wrong and everything I say is absolutely right. I’m happy about that because I want to be honest with them. I find that I spend a lot of time explaining myself to my children. I justify my decisions to them. Not because I might be wrong (even though I might) but because they need to know how I’ve arrived at my decisions.
Comment by: Rev. Dan
34@Mike:
The book you suggested might not be for me for a number of reasons, but I’m taking the suggestion as "hey, Mike respects what I’m saying and is feeling some empathy for me." Thanks for caring enough to read what I’ve written and taking the effort to try to understand me, especially since we’re not on the same page. A dude couldn’t ask for more.
@Jason:
I’m not saying you’re perfect, I’m saying that I appreciate folks who prioritize their children. It’s responsible, and I like seeing it. You’re right that it’s wrong to pedestalize your kids but I’m throwin’ ya props for trying to be a good parent and understanding that you’re not always a "perfect" one. (Same goes all around… I’m a fan of good behavior, though I don’t always behave well myself.)
@Regarding Counseling:
I’ve been in and out of counseling and find that it’s all about whether or not you find somebody who works for you. Finding one that you respect enough to actually talk to is tough. It’s certainly been challenging for me. I’ve had good moments in counseling and I’ve had really destructive and damaging moments in counseling. Cue the long story:
My parents used to take me to family counseling when I was a kid. The whole situation was set up so that they could take the role of "helpless victimized parents" and they manipulated the rather stupid and unprofessional counselor into continuing to perpetuate their abuse. That dude screwed me more than once, but I ended up winning the war with the bad counselor. Since I knew anything and everything I said would be used against me, I didn’t say a word. Instead, I ran my thumbnail through the threaded grooves in my jeans. I remember the counselor yelling at me and wondering why God wasn’t saving me from the counselor. I figured that God wasn’t listening because I was a sinner. I had Mormon parents, they were going to Hell, and therefore I was going to Hell too. Apparently saying the prayer with Ms. Christian in the closet meant nothing to God, since I was so wicked-evil.
Family counseling could have been considered brilliant and cunning manipulation coupled with outstanding dramatic performances but by that point in time I think they’d honestly come to believe that I was hellspawn. Literally. According to what I understand to be their perspective, everything I did in life was calculated to give them misery. It was like I God’s judgement on them or something.
Parents: "Why Danny, why won’t you talk to us and tell us how you feel? We’re so worried about you, look what you’re doing to us!"
Adult Dan responds: "Uh, I’m not going to tell you how I feel ’cause you get off on my misery."
I’ve had a couple of good experiences with counselors/therapists as an adult and I’ve had a lot of worthless counseling. It’s all about who <em>works</em> for <b>you</b>.
I personally regard formal therapy as a waste of time, probably because I haven’t been able to afford the level of care that I need.
@Regarding Forgiveness:
Since I try to stick with what I know, I have nothing to say on this subject. ;) ;) ;)
@Regarding My Well-Being:
I’m writing this part purely because it has occurred to me that since there are cool, caring folks who are making the effort/taking the time to read what I’m writing that someone might be concerned for me in regards to my current general well-being, particularly since a lot of what I’m writing is pretty "heavy" or at least non-typical for comments on a blog. I promise you that I’m ok and that writing this stuff isn’t bringing me down or putting me in any dangerous position.
While I’m a little bit annoyed with myself for spending so much time writing epic-length blog comments because I’m not slinging code and bringing myself closer to releasing my software project, it’s been pretty cathartic.
I notice that every time I make a conscious decision to improve my life that tons of bullshit and dross rises up to try to smack me back down. I’ve been doing a lot better this round and have had some pretty amazing experiences in the past few weeks… I should probably write epic-length comments about them too.
This might sound arrogant but I’ve been feeling really proud of myself lately. It’s been a long time since I’ve even wanted to try enough to actually take a baby step forward. I’ve taken several recently and have netted some wins. It feels like a maintainable trajectory.
If all this is a result of someone praying for me, would you please consider asking that I be given the opportunity to be "independently wealthy?" ;) :) ;)
@Regarding Forgiveness:
I’m too tired to comment on this now, but I have a lot of thoughts/questions.
Comment by: Jason
35Dan, just a quick question, were the counsellors trained as therapists or child psychologists or where they well meaning but crap Christians who thought that their faith put them in a good position to help others? I suspect the latter but I don’t want to assume anything.
That said I shall proceed under that assumption. I hear of Christian child counsellors or marriage\relationship counsellors who get that role on the basis that they are a regular church goer who expresses an interest in helping others. Laudable sentiment I’m sure you’ll agree but without any training they don’t know what they’re doing. People who don’t know what they’re doing can do more harm than good.
This is why I believe that anyone offering counselling should be trained, licenced and regularly assessed by an independent auditor. Proper training protects not just the person being counselled but the counsellor as well. If you were given inappropriate or damaging advice you’d have the right to take litigious action against the counsellor and the organisation who sponsored them. Training and assessment reduces that risk and provides a framework to base insurance against litigation. It also, much more importantly, reduces the potential for harm to the people being counselled.
As an aside “counsellor” is one of those words that Americans spell wrong. It might look strange to you but the fact is that I’m right in my spelling and the entire nation of 300 million Americans aren’t. OK? :)
Oh and I’m glad that you’re making progress.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
36Rev. Dan and Jason, my experience with professionally trained counselors (sorry Jason, in this case I like the American spelling) has been mixed. The atheist one was awful and the two Christian [professionally qualified] ones were good but this is too small a sample to draw conclusions from about faith and quality. The main reason the atheist was bad was, she was a psychoanalyst. Never again, now I know what psychoanalysis is.
Along with that I am very wary of Christians who take on counseling roles with no formal training. It’s very hit or miss whether they have acquired any counseling skills along the way. So I do agree with Jason’s concern about them. (Just not his spelling!)
I think that happens to everyone who decides to move forward in their life instead of sticking with what doesn’t work well but has the ‘benefit of familiarity’.
That’s awesome. Could you email me an epic-length post about them (when you have time) and I’ll post it as its own post?
Part of the purpose of this blog is to give atheists space to share various aspects of what life is like as an atheist. I think a post about your recent experiences would fall well in line with that.
You’re also welcome to continue participating in all other conversations on here. It’s a both/and offer, not an either/or :)
Comment by: Jason
37You’ll never finish your code now, Dan. ;)
Comment by: Mike O
38At least we know how to spell ‘organization.’ The company I used to work for was based in York, UK and they constantly misspelled their ‘z’ (pronounced ‘zee’, not ‘zed’) words.
Comment by: Elizabeth Chapin
39Sorry for disengaging, forgot to subscribe to comments ;-( Anywho, Jason asked why I rejected not having a faith after exploring other options and my answer is complicated, but one thing that I’m sure played a part was a boyfriend I had in college who was agnostic when we met, and at that time I was exploring my options after having a disappointment with my Christian faith. My boyfriend had two best friends from high school - one who was an extreme atheist who heckled campus preachers and was in your face about his views. Another was a more mild mannered guy who became a Christian in college. We ended up moving across the country with his atheist best friend and it wasn’t long before my boyfriend turned from being agnostic to antagonistic toward Christians. At that point I still identified to some degree with being a Christ follower and their attitude kind of discouraged me.
Another influence was that I still seem to have so many questions that aren’t being answered apart from a faith in God and I’ve had too many unexplainable supernatural experiences to write off the existence of a supernatural being who wants to communicate with me - though I am not ruling out the possibility of those experiences being delusions on my part or extra-terrestrial encounters of some kind. Even though I have chosen to be a Christ follower, I am still open minded to new discoveries and continue to research and study the nature of the universe.
I recently purchased The God Delusion and plan to read it this summer.
Comment by: Jason
40Mike, bleedin’ foreigners ruinin’ the Queen’s English. The “z” is a recent invention, the “s” comes from the French….that might be the other way around. I’m easy either way and both seem to be in common usage in England. As long as you’re consistent it doesn’t matter too much. I’m not that pedantic. OK I am, but not that often.
Elizabeth, we’re all influenced by the behaviour of others. My own experience with Christians was largely negative until recent years. I found them to be condescending and judgmental as well as dismissive of questions. It’s hardly surprising that some atheists will react in a negative or antagonistic way. I know I did.
However a vocal negative minority shouldn’t necessarily tar all atheists (or Christians) with the same brush. A point that was finally drummed into my thick head by a Christian who showed humour and kindness to my obnoxious questioning. It doesn’t make me a Christian but it does make me a bit more tolerant to other views. Even when they’re wrong. ;)
You say that you have questions that are only answered by including faith in your life. For me it was the opposite. Faith blocked analysis of questions, it interfered with my understanding and muddled everything. Not including faith makes things so much clearer for me.
On the issue of the supernatural I have to say that the whole idea of there being any phenomena that cannot be explained by natural science is difficult for me to accept. That isn’t to say that there isn’t anything that currently does not have an explanation, that would be a lie. Just that claiming a supernatural cause before exhausting all possible natural causes just feels lazy to me.
Comment by: Jason
41Oh and The God Delusion is a good read. The second half is fairly easy for a theist to argue against really but the first half is brilliant. I might re-read mine actually. I always get more from a book the second time I read it.
Comment by: Rev. Dan
42I enjoyed the bits of The God Delusion that I read though I didn’t read a whole bunch. I should find it in my pile and give it another go. Maybe we could discuss it here? :)
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
43I think discussing it here would be fun. When shall we do that? We need time to read/reread it first.
(I have the book but haven’t read much of it)
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
44Jason wrote:
Jason was Bill the Christian?
Comment by: Stephan
45I was very disappointed with The God Delusion. One of his biggest arguments, to which he goes time and time again, is that everything complex develops from something simple, therefore God, being complex, must have developed from something simple, therefore making God impossible.
The fallacy, of course, is that “everything we know” is the same as “everything”. Dawkins assumes we know everything. In our experience everything complex develops from something simple, but that does not mean that something outside of our experience may have taken a different course. Also, development requires one key ingredient - time. If God exists outside of the constraints of time, then the argument is entirely moot. Dawkins never accounts for this possibility.
Admittedly, I only read the first half of the book. It it he tries to prove that God most likely does not exist. The second half examines what this means and what we should do about it. Since I thought he did a very poor job of convincing me that God did not exist, I really didn’t care what I should do about it.
Comment by: Elizabeth Chapin
46Jason, fortunately my ex-boyfriend (who I almost married but now he dresses up as a Roman Soldier for Halloween out to capture Christians and feed them to the lions!) did not ruin my view of my fellow humans who have differing views from me, but his antagonism toward Christians certainly ruined our relationship. While I try to be tolerant of antagonistic extremists - it’s difficult to be with intolerant people regardless of their faith persuasion. I have quite a few friends of differing faith persuasions - some atheists, some Buddhists, some who take a little from here and a little from there, and some who are just having fun living life and don’t contemplate the nature of the universe much.
Jason, you said,
I hear what you are saying here, though unfortunately I do not have the intelligence individually nor the research funds or other resources to exhaustively search out the source of all things yet unexplained in my world. And, in a sense, the term “supernatural” is inadequate. I believe in a creator who is involved relationally with the creation, and while there are still many things in the created universe that are a mystery to us, I do believe that with the advances of science we will discover and know many things that appear to be “supernatural” today. I also believe that science will lead more and more to the discovery of a creator and so I heartily support and invest in scientific exploration. I have a special interest in extra-terrestrial life as does my husband, so we contribute our computer time to the SETI project.
I’d love to read and discuss The God Delusion here, shall we set a time?
Comment by: Jason
47I wrote a really long and highly amusing response that was, unfortunately, eaten by the Internet Comment Eating Monster. I shall attempt to compose a second similar reply but I fear that it will pale in comparison to my original masterpiece.
Curses!
Back later.
Comment by: Elizabeth Chapin
48I hate that Internet Comment Eating Monster, you never know when the ICEM is going to invade a web page near you! I’m sure we all look forward to revision 2 and trust it will be sufficiently amusing and engaging. ;-)
Comment by: Jason
49Helen, it was Bill, I’m sure I’ve mentioned it on his site a few times but he’s far too modest to make a big deal about it.
On The God Delusion I’d love to have a discuss the book but I do need to reread it again myself. It’s been almost exactly a year since I read it. I’m in the middle of another book at the moment and I’ve finally got hold of Jim and Casper Go to Church which I’ve been meaning to read all year.
Stephan said:
I think it important to note that he doesn’t offer a proof but does say that the chances of there being a god of any kind, not just the Christian God is very unlikely. There’s not a 100% certainty, which he acknowledges and even plays on, so there cannot be a proof. Given the assumption that gods are unlikely he details how to live with that idea. Much of that idea is interesting but some of it is a bit muddled as I recall. It’s certainly worth me rereading it so that it’s clearer in my own mind.
On the subject of time I’d hesitate to make any assumptions about the nature of time itself. We know so little about time. We can’t even measure it or conceive of a way of measuring it. Instead we invent a way of counting increments over time and call them seconds or minutes. We don’t even know if time is a constant, linear phenomena or not. We don’t even know for sure if it exists. If you’re interested in time then I can recommend Stephen Hawking’s public lectures for some background. They’re fascinating.
Elizabeth, firstly Roman soldiers have very little to do with the Halloween feast so I don’t know why he’s dressing up and secondly: where did he get a lion? Don’t the animal control people notice him feeding people to it? Don’t the police have anything to say or is the lion really big?
Anyway, given your lack of resources to fathom out every answer to every question how can you ascribe God as the answer? Surely God is merely one of many possibilities? Take the established theory of the Big Bang for example. No-one knows anything about events prior to the Big Bang, nothing at all. The cause could have been spontaneous, it could have been God, it could have been the death throws of last God raging at his own demise, it could have been the near miss of two singularities or the collision of matter and antimatter forming out of a vast multiverse of universes. Nobody knows.
Your comment about the supernatural becoming understood echos something that I heard Richard Dawkins say: “When the supernatural is explained it ceases to be supernatural and becomes natural.” I don’t believe in the supernatural but I do believe that there are natural things that we don’t have adequate explanations for. Unlike you I don’t believe that the explanation is God but, who knows, I’ve been wrong before.
Comment by: Ir (Helen)
50Jason wrote:
Jason, Halloween is an amazingly elaborate affair over here - you have no idea!
I expect Elizabeth has personal experience she attributes to God which tips the balance in God’s favor. Christians usually have that along with thinking God is a plausible explanation for the way the universe is.
Comment by: Elizabeth Chapin
51Yeah, the whole Roman soldier thing is purely dramatic - no real lion. And I do have some personal experiences, answers to prayer and such that I do attribute to God, though I do not rule out coincidence and am interested in doing brain research to find out if I am merely hearing voices sometimes! ;-) I’ve had some discussions with a friend about whether a person’s brain chemistry might predispose them to belief - we both have taken brain chemistry altering drugs for depression/anxiety type conditions. In my opinion, it’s a worthy field of study and I am considering researching brain activity and belief for my doctorate degree someday…
Comment by: Mike O
52That would be interesting. I hope you’re studying somewhere that will take you seriously.